<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Fast and Easy Tech Fixes for CPA Firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cpatrendlines.com/2010/01/25/four-fast-and-easy-tech-fixes-for-cpa-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cpatrendlines.com/2010/01/25/four-fast-and-easy-tech-fixes-for-cpa-firms/</link>
	<description>Actionable Intelligence for the Tax, Accounting and Finance Community from Bay Street Group LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:26:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Foster</title>
		<link>http://cpatrendlines.com/2010/01/25/four-fast-and-easy-tech-fixes-for-cpa-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-547324</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpatrendlines.com/?p=5609#comment-547324</guid>
		<description>Executives-be sure your CPA saw this article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Executives-be sure your CPA saw this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Davis</title>
		<link>http://cpatrendlines.com/2010/01/25/four-fast-and-easy-tech-fixes-for-cpa-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-547053</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpatrendlines.com/?p=5609#comment-547053</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading your article, &quot;Four Fast and Easy Tech Fixes&quot;  As the IT Manager for a mid-sized accounting firm, I can say from experience that when there is top-down support for a project, things happen much smoother with less rumbling and are usually more successful.  In your article you say, &quot;If your accounting firm or finance department is pushing off  technology decisions to the IT department, you may be pushing it off to the wrong people&quot; and I agree with that statement.

However, I have also seen where decisions are made without the knowledge of the IT Department only to find out that they either wouldn&#039;t work in the current environment, or that additional costs are needed that were not planned into the project. If you read any new medium-sized or large application that is not SaaS, ASP, or Cloud there are usually minimum technical requirements. Often just sharing this with your IT head will let you know if the existing infrastructure has the capability to support the new application.

I am of the absolute belief that business drives technology. Unfortunately, many technology people in the past have either not understood this critical philosophy or chose to ignore it and therefore IT is often dismissed because they do not understand the business. There is nothing more important to an IT Manager/Director than understanding the business, where the business is going, and planning for that future.  This can not be done by the IT Manager, but has to be done with a collaboration of the firm leadership, the segment leaders, and the technology leader. It is when one makes decisions in a silo that mistakes are often made. This is also true among the segment leaders.  If each of the segment leaders is able to make decisions based upon what is best for their segment and not what is best for the firm, then you can have disparate systems that provide no cross-functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading your article, &#8220;Four Fast and Easy Tech Fixes&#8221;  As the IT Manager for a mid-sized accounting firm, I can say from experience that when there is top-down support for a project, things happen much smoother with less rumbling and are usually more successful.  In your article you say, &#8220;If your accounting firm or finance department is pushing off  technology decisions to the IT department, you may be pushing it off to the wrong people&#8221; and I agree with that statement.</p>
<p>However, I have also seen where decisions are made without the knowledge of the IT Department only to find out that they either wouldn&#8217;t work in the current environment, or that additional costs are needed that were not planned into the project. If you read any new medium-sized or large application that is not SaaS, ASP, or Cloud there are usually minimum technical requirements. Often just sharing this with your IT head will let you know if the existing infrastructure has the capability to support the new application.</p>
<p>I am of the absolute belief that business drives technology. Unfortunately, many technology people in the past have either not understood this critical philosophy or chose to ignore it and therefore IT is often dismissed because they do not understand the business. There is nothing more important to an IT Manager/Director than understanding the business, where the business is going, and planning for that future.  This can not be done by the IT Manager, but has to be done with a collaboration of the firm leadership, the segment leaders, and the technology leader. It is when one makes decisions in a silo that mistakes are often made. This is also true among the segment leaders.  If each of the segment leaders is able to make decisions based upon what is best for their segment and not what is best for the firm, then you can have disparate systems that provide no cross-functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Four Fast and Easy Tech Fixes for CPA Firms : CPA Trendlines -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://cpatrendlines.com/2010/01/25/four-fast-and-easy-tech-fixes-for-cpa-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-547049</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Four Fast and Easy Tech Fixes for CPA Firms : CPA Trendlines -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpatrendlines.com/?p=5609#comment-547049</guid>
		<description>This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bill Sheridan, MACPA, Cam Sivesind and others. Cam Sivesind: http://bit.ly/7UtsFd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bill Sheridan, MACPA, Cam Sivesind and others. Cam Sivesind: <a href="http://bit.ly/7UtsFd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7UtsFd</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Patrick, CPA.CITP</title>
		<link>http://cpatrendlines.com/2010/01/25/four-fast-and-easy-tech-fixes-for-cpa-firms/comment-page-1/#comment-547043</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Patrick, CPA.CITP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpatrendlines.com/?p=5609#comment-547043</guid>
		<description>Good stuff here, as always! However regarding the triple monitors... I am recommending to our clients to replace the second with a good 24&quot; or 27&quot; wide screen. It gives you a large canvas for working on that doesn&#039;t have the rigid limits of the multiple screen segments Also, it eliminates the challenges associated with having the hardware capable of more than 2 screens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff here, as always! However regarding the triple monitors&#8230; I am recommending to our clients to replace the second with a good 24&#8243; or 27&#8243; wide screen. It gives you a large canvas for working on that doesn&#8217;t have the rigid limits of the multiple screen segments Also, it eliminates the challenges associated with having the hardware capable of more than 2 screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

