When Returns Should Be Submitted for Review

Three times it’s appropriate.

By Ed Mendlowitz
How to Review Tax Returns: The Field-Tested Update

The workflow of returns submitted to reviewers needs to be managed, otherwise the reviewer could become overloaded with incomplete or partially completed returns waiting on additional information. This adds nonproductive work to the reviewer that can best be delegated to the preparer, who is actually delegating it to the reviewer, i.e., upward delegation, which makes no sense, or have it assigned to an administrative person for follow-up. For efficiency I suggest that the preparer is the best person to follow up and maintain control of the incomplete return.

MORE: 10 Errors That ‘Smart’ Scanners Make | Three Ways to Improve Tax Returns | Don’t Use Eyes, Use Brain | Three Types of Tax Return Reviews | Tax Review Procedures Are Your Quality Control | Seven Types of Tax Return Reviews | How to Turn Tax Returns into New Business
GoProCPA.comExclusively for PRO Members. Log in here or upgrade to PRO today.

The firm mindset must be to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of the reviewer. (I keep repeating this. This must be a top goal if you want to get the best that the reviewers can offer to you.)