The conversations you should be having right now.
By Hitendra Patil
There is something that consistently gets missed in the private equity conversation, and I have watched it get missed from both sides: the people inside firms that took PE money, and the independent owners watching from outside.
MORE by Hitendra Patil
Exclusively for PRO Members. Log in here or upgrade to PRO today.
Independent firms hold real structural advantages that the PE model works against by design. For the right clients, those advantages are not a secondary consideration. They are the core of the relationship.
The Exit Clock Changes Every Decision
A PE-backed firm operates with a sale as its eventual destination. Holding periods run three to seven years. That is the model, not a flaw in it. Every significant decision – pricing, staffing, technology investment, service mix – gets filtered, consciously or not, through what makes the firm more attractive to the next buyer.
An independent firm answers to its partners and its clients. For clients who think in decades – family businesses, closely held companies, and people managing wealth across generations – that distinction shapes every conversation. They are deciding whether to work with someone who will build alongside them for the long run, or someone whose planning horizon ends before theirs does.
I saw this play out in specific terms not long ago. A manufacturing client had worked with the same CPA firm for over a decade. When that firm took PE backing, the founding partner stayed for about 18 months and then stepped back. Within eight months after that, two senior managers had taken positions elsewhere inside the PE platform. The client eventually called an independent firm and said, “I just want to know that the person I talk to this year will still be there next year.”
That is not sentimentality. It is a rational business concern, and it is one your firm is positioned to address in ways a PE-backed firm, structurally, is not.
Niche Depth That Takes Years to Build
PE platforms grow through acquisition. More firms, more locations, more service lines. What that model does not produce on its own is deep, industry-specific knowledge built over years of working within a single sector.
A firm owner I worked with for several years in Massachusetts built his entire practice around restaurant accounting. Not food service broadly, but restaurants specifically. He understood labor cost ratios, prime ratio, POS integrations, tip-reporting compliance, inventory valuation and the audit exposures that appear seasonally in that industry.
When PE-backed competitors entered his market, his clients stayed. What he knew had been assembled over 15 years of consistent, focused work. It could not be quickly replicated by a larger firm moving into the space.
PE can buy the client relationships when it acquires a firm, but it cannot control whether those relationships survive the integration that follows.
The Relationship That Survives Reorganization
After a PE acquisition, staff changes and system transitions are nearly standard. Partners who sell often may not stay past year two. The relationships clients built over the years get reassigned or quietly discontinued.
In my work with firm owners across hundreds of engagements, I have found that client retention following a major advisor transition is one of the most underestimated risks in the profession. Clients rarely announce they are leaving because of it. The pattern shows up in the numbers once you start looking, and by then the relationship is already gone. Staying independent removes that risk entirely. For the right clients, that alone is worth more than a broader service menu.
How to Make These Advantages Visible Without Sounding Defensive
This is the part of the conversation most independent firm owners skip, and it is worth naming directly. You have real structural advantages over PE-backed competitors. Most of your clients do not know that, because most independent firm owners have not learned to describe those advantages without it sounding like an attack on someone else.
The language that works is not comparative. It is descriptive. When a client asks, directly or indirectly, whether your firm will be acquired or whether you can grow with them, the answer is not “we are better than the PE firms.” The answer is “here is how we are built and here is why that structure serves you specifically.”
A few phrases that work in practice, drawn from conversations I have had with firm owners who navigate this well:
- “We answer to our clients and our partners. There is no investment horizon shaping our decisions about how to serve you.”
- “When we bring someone new into your relationship, it is because they are the right person for your situation, not because of how our staffing is structured above us.”
- “I have been advising this type of business for 15 years. That depth doesn’t transfer easily. It stays here.”
None of those statements requires mentioning PE. They describe what you are and let the client draw their own conclusions. The clients who care about these things – and more of them do than most independent firm owners realize – will hear it and respond. The ones who don’t will have learned something true about your firm.
The most important context for these conversations: they work best when they happen proactively, before a client has started wondering. A client who already has one foot out the door, having watched their peers move to a larger firm, is harder to retain with descriptive language alone. The clients worth keeping need to hear this from you before they are already weighing their options.
What This Actually Means for How You Compete
You are a different kind of firm, built for a different kind of client. A specific, findable group of clients will actively prefer what you offer over what a larger, better-capitalized competitor can provide. The rest of this guide is about identifying that group, serving them in ways no generalist firm can match, and making sure they know you are there.
| THE ONE PRACTICALLY IMPLEMENTABLE TIP
In your next 10 client meetings, ask one question you have never asked before: “Has anything changed about how you think about who you want advising you over the next five years?” The answers will tell you which clients are with you because of genuine relationship depth and which ones are with you out of inertia. The first group is worth investing in. The second group needs a retention strategy before someone else starts that conversation with them. |
The Client Conversation You Are Not Having
Most independent firm owners understand intellectually that their structural independence is an advantage. Very few have learned to describe that advantage in a client conversation without it sounding either defensive or vague. The language matters more than the concept. Here is what actually works across three specific client types.
For a family business owner who has worked with your firm for more than five years: “One thing I want you to know about how we are structured, there is no outside investor involved in how we run this firm: no fund timeline shaping how we staff your work, no acquisition agenda affecting which relationships we prioritize. The person you call this year will still be here next year, and the year after that, because our decisions about how to serve you are driven entirely by what is right for your situation. For some clients, that is just background. For you, given what you are building toward, I think it actually matters.”
For a growth-stage company watching its peers move to larger PE-backed firms: “I understand why larger firms look attractive when you are growing. More service lines, more resources, broader reach. What I would ask you to think about is what you are actually buying with that move. The PE-backed firm will serve you well right up until the moment its priorities shift, and at a PE-backed firm, those priorities shift on a timeline that has nothing to do with your situation. We grow with you because your growth is the only timeline we are managing.”
For a client who has a lender, institutional investor, or is approaching a transaction where audit credibility matters: “I want to make sure you understand something specific about our independence. Our attest function operates without any outside ownership interest or administrative services agreement with a PE-controlled entity. That structure is increasingly relevant to clients in your situation, where a lender, an investor or a buyer will look at who conducted your audit and what their ownership structure looks like. We can explain exactly what our independence means for your engagement if that conversation would be useful.”
Mapping Relationship Coverage Before You Need It
The most common reason independent firms lose long-standing clients after a partner transition is not the transition itself. It is that the relationship existed at the partner level and was never deliberately extended to the firm level. By the time the transition happens, the client has no real connection to anyone else at the firm, and the new contact they are assigned feels like a stranger. That is when they start taking calls from competitors.
The fix is a relationship coverage map, built now, before any transition is imminent. For your top 20 clients by revenue, answer three questions for each one.
- Who at this firm, besides the primary partner, has a genuine relationship with the client decision-maker, meaning the client would take their call unprompted?
- Who at this firm has been introduced to the client in a way that the client would remember?
- What client-specific knowledge exists in a system your firm controls, versus in a partner’s memory or inbox?
Clients who answer “no” to the first question pose the highest retention risk. They are not at risk because the partner is leaving; they are at risk because the partner is the entire relationship. The remediation is simple but has to happen before it is necessary: introduce a second contact, naturally, with a role and a reason. “I want you to know, Sarah, that the person who leads our work in this area will be sitting in on our next few conversations.” That early introduction is insurance. Made late, it feels like a handoff.
| THE ONE PRACTICALLY IMPLEMENTABLE TIP
This week, pull your top 20 clients and run the relationship coverage map. For any client where the honest answer to the first question is no, only one person at your firm has a real relationship with them, schedule one joint meeting or call in the next 60 days where a second firm contact is introduced naturally. Do not wait for a partner transition to make this move. The clients where it matters most are the ones you cannot afford to lose. |