If AI Is Saving Time, Why Are You Still Working Late?
How fast (or slow) are accountants adopting AI? Depends on whom you ask.
Six Surveys. Eleven Answers.

By CPA Trendlines Research
Hourly billing is fading. Advisory is spreading. Artificial intelligence is freeing accountants to do more valuable work.
But agreement may end there.
The meanings of adoption, advisory and the AI dividend are leaving firm leaders with sometimes clashing pictures of how far the change is going.
MORE AI: Gen AI in Accounting: Epic Transformation, or Overheated Hype? | Intuit, Thomson, Wolters Kluwer: Accountants Question AI Promises | Caseware’s David Marquis: AI Can Do More Work but Auditors Must Make the Call | AI Accountants Cut Costs per Task to 21 cents from $10.35 | Your Next Hire Might Not Be an Accountant | It’s Not Just the Numbers
The problem surfaces again in a fresh series of surveys that tell different, even confusing, versions of the same story. One study finds advisory in 57 percent of surveyed U.S. practices. Another puts advisory or consulting at 94 percent in its U.S. sample. A pricing-platform survey finds little hourly billing for particular services. A broader practice-management benchmark finds most responding firms still use hourly billing.
Firm leaders are being shown evidence of progress, but the evidence does not consistently measure the same progress. READ MORE →




