5 Cautionary Tales in Partner Compensation

Older man reading newspaper by fireplaceDo you see your firm here?

By Marc Rosenberg
Partner Comp: Art & Science

Here are five case studies to illustrate potential problems in partner compensation.

MORE ON PARTNER COMPENSATION: Does Compensation Motivate Performance? | Why Compensation and Buyout Plans Must Be Synchronized | When Partner Vacation Becomes Excessive | Management Stipends: Who, How and Why | The 8 Basics for Data-Based Partner Performance Evaluations | Crash Course: Operating a Compensation Committee | 11 Points in Designing a Partner Comp System | What Partners Earn and How They Earn It
GoProCPA.comExclusively for PRO Members. Log in here or upgrade to PRO today.

The Stressed-out MP.  This seven-partner firm had recently changed from having the “MP decides” method of income allocation to usage of a compensation committee because the burden of allocating income was too stressful for the MP. The ensuing problems with the compensation committee, all solvable, were:

  1. Mandatory rotation of CC members resulted in people on the CC who were not credible and used their role to boost their own income.
  2. No communication between the CC and the individual partners about expectations and income allocation.
  3. Frequent, bitter arguments among CC members.